Skip to content
ALLOT TECH5 GALLONWATERFilling machine solutions

Equipment overview / Existing-line replacement guide

Replacing a 5 Gallon Water Filling Machine in an Existing Line

Replacing the washer-filler-capper does not automatically require replacing every machine around it. Nor does matching the old machine’s BPH prove that existing equipment can be reused. Start with an as-built survey, identify what will remain, and make approval of each bottle, mechanical, water and control interface a condition of the proposal.

Content reviewed:

Catalog reference of large-bottle washing, filling and capping equipment
Catalog equipment reference; not an as-built drawing or compatibility approval.

Replacement checklist

Machine replacement, not a complete factory redesign

Define what is being replaced—and why

Describe the decision, not just a wish for a newer model. Is the proposed work replacing the core washer-filler-capper, adding bottle preparation, or changing the container format? Give authorized engineers the fault history if repair is still an option. This guide does not determine remaining machine life, a repair budget, or the economics of replacement. Keep plant-wide expansion and building work in their separate engineering scope.

  • Name the removed machine and the retained modules
  • State the problem and the evidence available
  • Record unresolved repair-versus-replacement questions

Build a keep, modify, replace or unknown register

List the decapper, external brusher, inspection station, core machine, cap feed and conveyors separately. For each, record its manufacturer, model, serial number, drawings, condition and proposed responsibility. An existing conveyor may remain useful but still need a different handover, guide or control review. Unknown condition is not equivalent to approved reuse. Do not commit to a fixed retrofit scope until responsible parties close those assumptions.

  • Assign one status to each tagged module
  • Identify who assesses retained equipment
  • Price identified changes separately from unresolved assumptions

Prove the actual bottle and transfer interfaces

Use the bottles and caps intended for the replacement project, including representative acceptable returned bottles where applicable. Survey transfer height, orientation, guide positions, support points and access around the proposed machine. A nominal 19L or 20L description does not establish neck, base, handle or tolerance compatibility. If more than one format is required, define separate approved runs and the changeover evidence; do not assume mixed-format operation.

  • Approve bottle, cap and sample identification together
  • Compare the old handover with the proposed drawing
  • Record change parts, adjustments and responsible approval

Review supply, discharge and stop/restart behavior

Compare the new machine’s required product-water, wash-water, air, electrical and drain conditions with measured site evidence. Ask for requirements under the relevant operating cycle, not only nameplate values. Identify the ownership of ready, no-water, blocked-outfeed and fault signals. Qualified staff must agree the connected stop/restart behavior; retaining a controller or motor does not prove compatibility, and no safety interlock should be bypassed to make the interface appear to work.

  • Record each connection, demand basis and owner
  • Document approved signals and controlled restart conditions
  • Keep mechanical fit and controls approval as separate checks

Plan the transition before removing the old machine

Agree delivery access, lifting and service responsibilities, installation sequence, utility isolation and the evidence required before production release. Give the supplier your allowable interruption window but do not treat it as a confirmed installation duration. Identify which work can be prepared in advance and who decides whether to postpone the cutover when critical data, equipment or qualified staff are missing. A preliminary equipment proposal cannot replace the site’s authorized safety and quality procedures.

  • Name the cutover decision owner and readiness evidence
  • Keep an authorized contingency plan and open-item list
  • Confirm manuals, spare parts and training before the handover

Accept the replacement as a connected cell

FAT can check the proposed machine with approved samples and the agreed test arrangement; it cannot by itself prove a connection to equipment that was not included in the test. Specify the remaining site checks for retained machines and actual utilities. Record accepted and rejected bottles, transfer behavior, cap application, recurring alarms and supply conditions against agreed criteria. Close deviations with responsible parties before quality release. Approval of output does not establish bottle hygiene or every safety requirement.

  • Separate factory evidence from remaining site evidence
  • Test agreed connected stop/restart and transfer conditions
  • Document deviations, retest results and release responsibility

What evidence makes an old module a reuse candidate?

Use one row for each handover, then attach the evidence to the tagged equipment register. A record of unknown data keeps the decision open; it is not permission to reuse the module.

Existing boundaryEvidence to obtainDecision before reuse
Incoming bottle transferDimensioned handover sketch, guide/support positions and identified bottle samples.Have the responsible engineer compare the old outlet with the new inlet; record required guides or transfer changes.
Product-water connectionNew machine demand basis, actual supply evidence under the agreed cycle and connection drawing.Confirm the agreed flow/pressure conditions and ownership; an old pipe diameter alone does not approve the supply.
Cap feed and applicationApproved cap/neck samples, closure method and the retained feeder’s documentation.Check feeder-to-capper compatibility separately. Do not assume a cap-present signal proves correct application or sealing.
Ready, fault and restart signalsInterface list, documented signal states and responsibility for each connected controller.Qualified staff must approve connected stop/restart behavior. Do not bypass an interlock to obtain apparent compatibility.
Finished-bottle dischargeBottle support and orientation, outfeed drawing and the agreed blocked-outfeed response.Witness the approved transfer/stop conditions with retained handling equipment; record changes and unresolved acceptance items.

This is a review framework, not approval to alter equipment. Operating, hygiene, electrical and safety parameters come from authorized project documents and delivered manuals.

Planning example: equal BPH, unequal handovers

Hypothetical example—not an Allot Tech installation or test result

Suppose the old filler and proposed machine both carry a nominal 300 BPH label. The new approved bottle has a different base shape, or the proposed discharge height differs from the old conveyor. Those matching rate labels cannot settle reuse. Keep the conveyor status unknown, attach the two handover drawings and sample IDs, and ask the named responsible party to define any guide/transfer changes and their acceptance evidence before the scope is approved.

Catalog reference of the large-bottle washing section
Catalog equipment reference; not an as-built drawing or compatibility approval.
Catalog reference of large-bottle transfer equipment
Catalog equipment reference; not an as-built drawing or compatibility approval.

Questions

Can the existing conveyors and external washer be kept?

Possibly, but only after their condition, bottle handling, physical handovers and control responsibilities have been assessed. List retained equipment explicitly; a reused module is not automatically included in the new supplier’s warranty or scope.

Does the replacement need the same BPH as the old filler?

No universal rule applies. Supply demand, actual container, retained modules and the agreed accepted-output requirement must be reviewed together. A matched nominal BPH label does not prove integration.

How many days will the change take?

No verified universal duration is available. Access, delivery, interface changes, qualified staff, site readiness and acceptance work must be resolved before a project-specific sequence and interruption window can be confirmed.

What if old drawings or manuals are missing?

Mark the missing evidence. Arrange an authorized as-built survey and technical review before assuming reuse. Photos can support that review, but they do not establish electrical ratings, control logic, sanitary condition or safety approval.

Request an Existing-Line Replacement Review

Send Mr Kcal your country, existing machine models, a dimensioned sketch, bottle and cap details, and the proposed replacement boundary. Include safe photos, available manuals and the allowed shutdown window. Mark missing information as unknown; reuse, changes and timing must be confirmed in the project documents.